« Sibel Edmonds Is Finally Vindicated By New Whistleblower! | Main
Elaine Meinel Supkis
There are two giant black holes in US
media: Israel and Japan. The actions of both nations are
deliberately obscured for various reasons. Huge hunks of real news
is deep-sixed by our media when the 'wrong' stories have to be
censored. I spend a lot of time talking about things that can be
very, very unpopular. Many people who are puzzled about why things
are happening, do not want to believe there is an active conspiracy
that is deliberately hiding real stories. Both the Japanese and the
Jews exploit WWII guilt feelings to run covert actions aimed at
enriching Israel and Japan at US expense. We see this yet again as
the US media totally hides the astonishing news about Sibel Edmonds
that broke in Europe yesterday.
And this is the time for those who have so far creditably leaked to the Times of London to come forward, accepting personal risks, to offer their testimony --- and new documents --- both to the Congress and to the American press. I would say to them: Don't do what I did and waste months of precious time trying to get Congressional committees to act as they should in the absence of journalistic pressure. Do your best to inform the American public directly, first, through the major American media.
But perhaps today the alternative media and the international press are a necessary precursor even to that. It shouldn't be true, but if it is, it's a measure of how far the New York Times and Washington Post have fallen from their responsibilities to the public, to their profession and to American democracy, since I gave them the Pentagon Papers in 1971. They printed them then. Would they today?
*snip*
It's impossible to believe that they --- or Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal --- could not have acquired documents and testimony that Murdoch's London paper reports on today. Now the challenge to them is to end their silence on that reporting and do their job.
Daniel Ellsberg was the fine gentleman who released the
important 'Pentagon Papers.' These papers were made top secret in
order to conceal war crimes and the true nature of the fatal Vietnam
War. Much of what these papers contained was information I and my
friends already knew. We snooped and pried out tons of information
concerning what was really going on. For example, I worked with
soldiers who came pouring out of Vietnam and ending up in San
Francisco, freaking out. At the Free Clinic, I was night staff and
dealt with the psychological and political problems of these men.
I heard many stories from them and the ones that alarmed me
the most were the stories they thought were funny, all of which were
war crimes, and the Agent Orange stories. I got a reporter onto
these stories and this broke the Agent Orange scandals. Anyway,
Ellsberg was one of the egg-heads who were set up to hide or justify
our imperial war crimes and he bravely chose to reveal the truth.
Bravo!
Why did the NYT publish this? I asked this back then and
answered it: the Times knew most Americans were already against the
war and Nixon was safely in office so it was OK to tell the truth
for once. Nothing that really mattered to the Ochs and Sulzberger
families, who are Jewish, was at stake. The entire board of
directors of the NYT are Jewish. We know from reading the NYT for
many years, when it comes to the nation that matters the most to the
NYT, state secrets about war crimes NEVER makes the front or even
the back pages. Israel gets to fly totally under the radar.
The media happily hammered Nixon over Watergate because it
had absolutely nothing to do with the great project: the expansion
of Jewish power in the Holy Land. The great Zionist game which has
been running for well over a century, long before Hitler, continues.
We are allowed scandals so long as the Jews involved are the 'good
guys' breaking stories that have no connection with Zionist dreams
or plans. When stories do break that intersect these plans, they are
ignored or lied about. For example, when the JDF ran over an
innocent, unarmed protestor, Rachel Corrie, and killed her, it
didn't make the news here. When it finally leaked over here, the NYT
ran complete lies about her murder.
Not one of the murders of Palestinian children shot or run over for fun by the JDF has ever made any mainstream news in the US. Very little about the sufferings of those unfortunate people ever makes the news here.
The Brad Blog is very popular. He is showing good indignation
about this latest example of treason being covered up. Of course,
the connection of Sibel's story to Israel is the key here. If we
don't talk about who owns the media and why they act totally against
the interests of the US whenever the crimes are committed by Jews
supporting Zionism, is a topic we all must hammer on. For if we
ignore this connection, we will be forever lost in the woods here.
In the left side of the internet, there has been a blanket
prohibition of talking about Zionism in particular or even in
general. Just as the 'peace' movement has
collapsed thanks to this refusal to talk about the connection
between Israel and our problems in Muslim lands, so has
understanding about 9/11 collapsed into a pile of dust due to the
need to focus only on how or why the buildings, gravely damaged by
two jets, collapsed. This is rather immaterial to me. The connection
between Muslim fury over the treatment of the Palestinians and the
corruption of the rulers of Islamic nations has also been
effectively severed on the left. Many leftists have talked
themselves into not believing there is even an al Qaeda or a bin
Laden.
The message bin Laden gave us was pretty clear. He is very
pissed off at the US corrupting Islamic rulers and the destruction
of the Palestinian people. I feel that the quite successful effort
of people anxious to have no one talk about these things has cut
the left off entirely from any hope of changing our national
direction or altering history at all.
I believe in first, analysis then action. Without one, the
other fails. During the early years of the Vietnam war, I
participated in and spoke at 'Teach Ins.' At one Teach In, I
infamously said, 'I won't be in the news even if I were to strip
down and give a speech.' The audience dared me to do this so I did.
To my amazement, I made the news for about one second. Then it was
pulled. HAHAHA. The point is, there are these black holes in the
news. Sibel Edmonds lives in one of these. If she stripped down
naked and read her accusations in public, she won't make the news.
Unless they can call her 'nuts' which is plan B.
I confess to doubting her story but only because she had no
hard proof and the CIA is notorious for spreading false stories. But
with the breaking news in Europe, this discomfort has been
emphatically removed and she is now an important story which must be
told in the US. And along with this has to come a brutal appraisal
as to who owns our media. If
anyone suggests the Jewish background of the vast majority of media
owners in the US, they are instantly accused of anti-semitism.
Especially if they are Jewish. The abuse of the Jewish son of
Holocaust survivors when he uncovered the abuse of the Holocaust by
Zionists who exploit this to further their criminal activities, poor
Finkelstein was dropped into the same black hole Edmonds is in.
The brutal cruelty of the Zionists comes from their bloody
past. Accustomed to assassination, black ops crimes, double dealing,
massacres of innocent, unarmed civilians and murky finances, the
Zionists have no compunction to bury stories they don't want us to
see. Treason is just one of their tools and an honest citizen
protecting America, if they spot Zionist crimes, either are
destroyed and defamed and lose their jobs or they are totally
ignored. Zionists happily use this word
[zionist] in Israel all the time but part of this program of
mind-control in the US and Europe, this word is verboten.
Anyone uttering the word, 'Zionist' is labeled an 'Anti-semite.'
This is how they smite everyone who gets in their path or who
reveals their activities.
These involve murder, assassination, spying, betraying our
financial interests, draining our Treasury or controlling our minds
which, to me, is criminal, obviously. The pious press loves to point
out how they destroy our leaders. This is proof they are the gate
keepers who keep people honest. Only they don't destroy anyone who
is furthering Zionist objectives. This is why we have 8 years of
Bush/Cheney insanity. The latest 'peace' farce in the Middle East
which increased arms sales and destabilized the region further and
included a fake naval incident directed at attacking Iran, is
typical. So long as Bush lets the Israeli Jewish Zionists 'create
facts on the ground' he is perfectly safe. Impeachment will not be
on the dinner table anytime soon, unlike with Nixon.
Way back then, I wondered why the media suddenly attacked
Nixon. They knew perfectly well, what was going on. We used to joke
during Watergate, 'Hey, everything we said is true.' Which wasn't a
joke at all, especially in my case. I knew perfectly well, what was
going on.
My own family is knee-deep, involved with the Saudi royals,
after all, as well as with the Chinese. It was obvious to me there
was a connection between the sudden media interest in the old
Watergate Story which they killed during the election. Many on the
left back then wondered why the obvious leads in the Watergate story
were ignored. But then, let's look at an old NYT story from that
election:
Breaking with established election-year politics, George McGovern has challenged official policies of the Israeli Government, calling for the creation of an independent Palestinian state and criticizing some of its key actions. While Mr. McGovern, again a candidate for the Democratic Presidential nomination, has been condemned for his views by some American Jews, he has been more than tolerated by others. Thursday night, in a speech in a synagogue in nearby Framingham, he received a standing ov...
Obvious, isn't it? Nixon, under obvious suspicion similar to
Bush when he ran a second time for office with the cloud of his
collusion in 9/11 attacks over his head, won in a landslide. What a
shock. Most of the nation was against the Vietnam War when McGovern
ran. I hung out a bit with him during that election. I admired his
bravery at taking on the Jewish media giants but feared, correctly,
he would be roasted alive for this and of course, being a war hero,
we all thought they had nothing on him.
But they did the 'disappearing act' on
him just like they are doing to Ron Paul and Edwards and Kucinich,
all three are not Zionists and therefore, were put in the black hole
where no one can hear them even if they strip down naked while
giving an important speech. Never again, will the Zionists allow any
American candidate for high office, even suggest the Jews stop
destroying the Palestinian people who are slated for ultimate
slaughter.
Once war-hero and anti-Vietnam War McGovern was destroyed,
the media then watched Nixon like a hawk. We know from the White
House tapes, he was very annoyed by all this. Just three days before
the war launched by Egypt and Syria broke out, Kissinger [Zionist]
became the Secretary of State. This war caused our economy to tank
due to the oil boycott and Nixon was under great pressure from the
King of Saudi Arabia. Shortly after the king was assassinated, Nixon
was disposed, too.
Nixon
Administration Ignores Saudi Warnings, Bringing On Oil Boycott
It was 24 years ago, on Oct. 20, 1973, that Saudi Arabia announced it was imposing a total oil boycott against the United States in retaliation for its support of Israel during the October war. The action caused an economic earthquake around the world.1 Suddenly Americans and others were forming long lines at gas stations, and the greatest transfer of wealth in world history began. The price of gasoline soared, briefly up tenfold. It was a devastating added cost for governments, corporations and families.
The embargo, Henry A. Kissinger later admitted, had "the most drastic consequences" for the United States, adding, "It increased our unemployment and contributed to the deepest recession we have had in the postwar [World War II] period."2 What Kissinger failed to say was that he bore major responsibility for the boycott.
The boycott could not have come as a surprise, as so many U.S. officials of the period have pretended. Since the beginning of 1973, Saudi Arabia's King Faisal ibn Abdul Aziz had been warning the Nixon administration with increasing urgency that he would employ the oil weapon unless Washington forced Israel to return Arab land it had been occupying since 1967. As guardian of Islam's holy sites, Faisal was particularly perturbed that Israel continued to occupy the Haram Al-Sharif with the Al Aqsa and Dome of the Rock mosques in Arab East Jerusalem. Haram Al-Sharif is the third holiest site, after Mecca and Medina, to the world's one billion Muslims.
Faisal, a proud and pious man, knew Egypt and Syria were planning war if Israel did not end its occupation. He thought war might be averted and Arab rights restored if he could influence President Richard Nixon to moderate U.S. support of Israel. In April the king sent one of his top aides, Oil Minister Ahmad Zaki Yamani, to Washington to warn officials of his seriousness about imposing an oil boycott.3
Kissinger is also the person who convinced Nixon he should
leave office and hand it over to Ford. He made promises to Nixon and
these were kept. No one went on trial. No one investigated the
connection between the media and Nixon's second election. No one
talked about anything of great importance. True, the Church
Committee went briefly after the CIA but that was fixed by Bush
Sr. taking over the joint and doing housework, cleaning
out the last of the anti-Zionists.
The Post was no more impressed by the Saudi message than Kissinger. On April 20, the Post editorially criticized the Saudis for threatening an oil boycott and added that "it is to yield to hysteria to take such threats as Saudi Arabia's seriously."5
Faisal was so disturbed by the U.S. rejection of his message that he granted for the first time in his life an interview to American TV. He warned: "America's complete support of Zionism against the Arabs makes it extremely difficult for us to continue to supply U.S. petroleum needs and even to maintain friendly relations with America."6
Israel was particularly active in encouraging Washington to ignore Faisal. Foreign Minister Abba Eban asserted that there was not "the slightest possibility" of an oil boycott. He added: "The Arab states have no alternative but to sell their oil because they have no other resources at all."
*snip*
In effect, the United States was now saying to the Arabs that it would finance Israel's fight to retain its illegal occupation of their land. At no time during the war did combat take place inside Israel itself. All the fighting was on Egyptian and Syrian soil.
An explanation for Nixon's reckless action can be found in the fact that in October Nixon was thinking less of foreign relations than of himself. By this time he was deep in the quagmire of the Watergate scandal and the devastating disgrace of his vice president. Spiro Agnew had resigned Oct. 10 after being accused of corruption. Nixon was desperate for political support, leaving Kissinger basically in charge of U.S. foreign policy throughout the October war.32
Nixon was very aware of the Israeli/US Jewish pressure. We
now know that 'Deep Throat' was Feldman, a Jew
who is also a Zionist tool. This was, from top to bottom, a
deep ops game run from the Zionist side of the CIA. Woodward was the
conduit. Note that he is an infamous Zionist
neocon pushing for wars against Israel's chosen 'enemies' today.
Indeed, the triumph of these Jewish/Zionist neocons over our entire
foreign policy is at root of the growing hatred and distrust that
dogs the US at every turn in the Middle East and beyond. They have,
thanks to the media, a death-grip on everything important to US
survival. Including installing the odious and nearly invisible
Chertoff as head of national security! He isn't even a citizen of
this country, he has TWO passports and the one that counts is the
Israeli one.
The
Blow Back from 'My nightmare in the Mediterranean'
12/30/07
During the last few days of 2007, Ron Kukal the Chaplain of the USS Liberty Veteran's Association and retired CT [Communications Technician] First Class and the Petty Officer in charge of the crew who recovered the remains of the 34 Americans who were murdered on June 8, 1967, and I conversed on phone and email about our frustrations of being labeled anti-Semitic when ever we speak up about the injustices the secular state and apartheid regime of Israel has been allowed to get away with. While I have only been speaking up for the last two and a half years, the old canard of 'anti-Semitic' has been hurled at me a multitude of times, but Ron and the survivors of that other day in infamy have endured that blasphemy for four decades.
Ron informed this civilian journalist, "For the last forty years I have taken offense to all the people who have labeled us LIBERTY Vet's anti-Semites just for trying to get an open transparent Congressional investigation to what happened to us on June 8, 1967, which was my nightmare in the Mediterranean.
The lack of any real investigation in a thousand things stems
from the media's death grip on the national conversation. Only
denizens of the web are aware that Sibel Edmonds even exists, for
example. The anthrax assassin hearings promised by Leahy have
vanished. The survivors of the Israeli attacks on the USS Liberty
have been demanding hearings, too. These American patriots are never
in the mainstream news and are treated contemptuously by Congress
and the Presidents of America refuse to even talk to them. The media
happily carried stories about abuses of US soldiers in Vietnam but
will not cover this crime story!
Sailor
Sells Secrets to 'Unknown' Nation:
NORFOLK, Va. (AP) — A sailor accused of stealing a Navy laptop and peddling its classified contents to an undisclosed foreign government pleaded guilty Monday to espionage, desertion and other charges.
If convicted, Petty Officer 3rd Class Ariel J. Weinmann, 22, of Salem, Ore., could face a sentence of life in prison without parole, a dishonorable discharge from the Navy and forfeiture of all pay.
*snip*
He said he did not report for duty aboard his submarine on July 3, 2005. He moved to Austria and never planned to come back to the United States, but changed his mind and was arrested in March at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.
*snip*
The military has not said what it believes Weinmann might have sought in exchange for the information.
This is yet another story the media deliberately black-holed.
The country this Jewish guy sold secrets to,
while in VIENNA, is 'unknown'. On the internet, we all figured out
this was Israel. At first, the media
pretended Russia wanted this information. Then China. Suddenly,
after both Russia and China protested the news, the country became
and remains 'Unknown.' As if! Like all the other spy stories
concerning Israel, this one makes no impression. This really steams
me because this is TREASON. And why the Jewish-owned sectors of our
media allow, excuse or enable this is TREASON. Of course, they want
us to think, it is not treasonous to support Israel even if this
hurts the US. This, again, is TREASON.
Alas! Why are they so stupid about this? The worse thing any
religious community can do is what they are doing: undermining their
home states in order to strengthen their religious base overseas. NO
nation should allow ANY religion to do this! Catholics
cannot support the Vatican before the US, for example. But some do.
This is why I want the Opus Dei members of the Supreme Court
impeached and removed from the bench. Uniformly, they vote
for unconstitutional things that destroy America for we are the
Constitution, not a mere nation!
The
Lobby on Trial
Upcoming legal battle dramatizes rising concern
about the Israel lobby
It seems to have fallen down the memory hole or been consigned to the purgatory of forgotten news stories: the indictment of Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, two top officials of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). More than three years ago, the news that Rosen, the number-one lobbyist for Israel in Washington, and his sidekick Weissman had been indicted for violating the Espionage Act, for handing over top-secret intelligence to Israeli embassy officials, broke like a thunderclap over official Washington. Today, its echoes have petered out almost entirely, as news of the case has sunk so far beneath the media's radar that developments in what is an important and fascinating story are no longer reported. I'll do my best to rectify that.
But first, one has to wonder, why is the veil of silence being drawn over this extraordinary affair? After all, the story involves what Time magazine called "among the most politically charged espionage cases in years" – surely a newsworthy topic. Why no follow-up?
Justin Raimondo has been on this story for a long time. At
this point it is obvious that NO Congress
person NOR President will EVER go after AIPAC unless the Jews who
own much of our media go after AIPAC. And they will not. This
is most dangerous. Not because they control us but because they
CANNOT control us if things go badly. The present crop of 'leaders'
who are at the top today in this election cycle are all warmongering
Zionists. And no marvel, either. They are the ONLY candidates
supported by the machinery here. I saw Hillary's hair raising speech
to AIPAC. That gathering was NOT in the news. I pointed this out
back when it happened before the election got into gear.
The list of speakers at the AIPAC
meeting was secret. Only because someone spilled the beans online,
did we get the list. Then, another whistle blower released
some of the speeches. What a travesty! All our
political leaders IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY as well as THE REPUBLICAN
PARTY were there and all endorsed the destruction of the
Palestinians, the expansion of Jewish power and the primacy of
Zionist goals over US goals. Here is a Zionist news site
talking about Pollard, another Jewish spy.
Spied
for China, Out in Three Months
Jonathan Pollard is into the 23rd year of a life sentence with no parole option for having passed classified information to a US ally. The data in question included information about Iraq's offensive weapons capabilities that endangered Israel. Just last month, former Pentagon analyst Ronald Montaperto was sentenced to just three months in prison for passing highly classified US information to China. US officials said Montaperto's actions "severely hampered" US efforts to track China's covert arms sales to terrorism-sponsoring countries such as Iran, Syria and Pakistan. US Federal Court Judge Gerald Bruce Lee said that despite the "very serious charge," he had received letters of support for Montaperto from intelligence and military officials that persuaded him to minimize the sentence.
The CIA and the military asked for a light sentence because
of murky reasons which have to do with setting up China or tracking
Muslim military activity. Which takes us back to Israel and Turkey
and Sibel Edmonds: what the hell is going on there? What is this
deep black ops game? Why was the very first person to die on 9/11, a
top Mossad agent sitting right next to the hijackers on
Atta's jet? Eh? And why isn't that 'happenstance' being
investigated? Or anything that connects Israel to 9/11, being
investigated?
I dislike the 9/11 Truth people because they are giving the
Zionists deep cover. Sounding insane, they make up stories that are
ridiculous while not hammering on the important details such as the
Mossad agent sitting right next to the hijackers and more, THEY KNEW
WHO HE WAS which is why they killed him instantly and suddenly. So
many dark questions surround this one act yet it is washed over by
hysterics who are BLAMING THE US PRESIDENT. Note how Zionists get
rid of both candidates for President and Presidents, themselves. In
Bush's case, they neutralize him this way. He won't stop Israel's
crimes if they have him eager to assist. Note that the 9/11 Truth
people are held back by the media but they will unleash them if Bush
were serious about 'peace' in the Middle East.
As it is, he offered Saudi Arabia more weapons and this
irritates Israel no end. Also, the other Arab kings are desiring
nuclear power like Iran and this infuriates Israel and their Jewish
supporters here in the US. So they are sharpening their swords and I
am betting Hillary Clinton will do their bidding perfectly.
This is her only way to power. And she knows this very well. She was
a Nixon girl, after all.